Wednesday 5 February 2014

Sorrow and Consolation: Grief in Tolkien's Created World


This week we brought out the Kleenex and talked about the depiction of grief and consolation in Tolkien’s fiction, thinking in particular about the Middle English poem Pearl.

Our first port of call was The Silmarillion’s Nienna, the Goddess who grieves for the sorrows of the world, as Tolkien relates:

"Nienna looked at the pale Moon under the shadow of her distant halls. She remembered the glory of the Two Trees and all the pain that Melkor caused by his greed and envy. But in silence she evoked the Music of The Ainur and how Melkor's actions were present even there, as a terrible melody in the middle of unfolding mysteries. And as she revived the Music in her thoughts, her sorrow grew but so did her compassion. For Nienna is the mighty one who cries for all the unjust and terrible things that happen in the world, but she is also the one that teaches endurance and wisdom through adversity. And by her tears, everything is purified and hallowed so that the mysteries can dance with the Music as it unfolds." (From The Silmarillion)

I asked what Nienna’s role tells us about Tolkien’s concept of his created world and the role of grief within it, and it was suggested that Tolkien sees grief as a primary component of Middle-Earth, one that is interwoven from the beginning. Whilst Greek mythology has a God of love and a God of war, Tolkien has a Goddess of sorrow. It was thought interesting that Nienna is assigned to grieve for the world’s sorrows, as if this in some way means that she will bear grief and cares so that others don’t have this burden. One member compared Nienna to Christ and Christ’s sorrow for man’s sins and the sufferings of the world.

From this meditation on Nienna’s grief, we moved on to study Pearl, using Tolkien’s translation of the Middle English dream-vision poem. In this poem, the narrator grieves for the death of his young daughter and weeps over her grave. There, he falls into a dream and comes to a beautiful land. The land has a cathartic quality that makes him forget his sorrow. He comes to a river and sees his daughter over the other side, all dressed in white. To cut a long (but very beautiful) poem short, she shows her father the kingdom of Heaven, which he has requested to see. But this is not enough for her father and he tries to cross the river to reach his child. He is forbidden by God, however, and wakes suddenly to find himself lying on his daughter’s grave once more.

The group compared the land and its cathartic quality to Lothlorien. We compared the river in Pearl to the river in Lothlorien, which cannot be crossed without permission. We thought about the sorrow the fellowship experienced after Gandalf’s fall and how the Golden Woods lifted their grief for a while. Such is the way Legolas describes it, when asked by Celeborn why they did not inform the Elves of Gandalf’s death sooner:

We have not spoken to Haldir of our deeds or our purpose,’ said Legolas. ‘At first we were weary and danger was too close behind; and afterwards we almost forgot our grief for a time, as we walked in gladness on the fair paths of Lorien.’ Frodo’s reply suggests grief can only be suspended for a short time, not forever: ‘yet our grief is great and our loss cannot be mended.’

We thought about how Pearl offers the narrator consolation, consolation because he knows his daughter has passed into a new life in Heaven. There is an interesting article, well worth reading, which discusses Pearl, the Ring and the theme of consolation.[1] The idea of consolation led us on to Boromir’s death and its promise of salvation. We considered the notion, put forward by Lynn Forest-Hill, that in The Lord of the Rings, ‘grief can be a response to change as well as to death, and while in either case it may express a profound sense of loss, it can also signal transition of a positive kind’.[2] In his article, Forest-Hill says:

[Tolkien’s] treatment of Boromir also marks his  rendering  of  the  cultural  and  stylistic  shift  from  the  Anglo-Saxon “doomed man” to the later fully Christian hero-knight for whom death is a transition or departure from mortality to salvation – the redeemed Christian hero whose errors can be forgiven.[3]

We debated this notion for some time, comparing Boromir’s death to that of Scyld Scefing in Beowulf, and also considering the ways in which he might have received forgiveness for his previous acts towards Frodo. We ended by thinking about consolation and need for closure through the creation of song, considering not only the 'Lament for Boromir' but also Frodo’s 'Lament for Gandalf'. For Frodo, being in Lothlorien stirs in him the desire to compose, and it is said that ‘his thought took shape in a song that seemed fair to him’; however, when he tried to tell the song to Sam, ‘only snatches remained, faded as a handful of withered leaves’.

Lastly, taking an very different approach to grief, we considered an article by Brent D. Johnson which considered Eowyn to be ‘a portrait of many soldiers’ family members who remained in England during World War I’.[4] We debated the extent to which we could or, indeed, should read Tolkien’s own experiences of war and grief into his work and whether or not Eowyn’s experience of grief was something more universal, not necessarily governed by the aftermath of World War One.

- Corinne






[1] Noah Koubenec, ‘The Precious and the Pearl: The Influence of Pearl on the Nature of the Ring’, Mythlore, 29 (2011), 119-131 Note, in particular: ‘The Ring and the Pearl are united in that both prove unable to provide peace or consolation for their respective admirers. It could be argued that Pearl contains an ultimately comforting 
message of salvation or at least a final note of consolation for the Jeweler that runs counter to the 
overwhelmingly negative depiction of the Ring and its power, yet in both Pearl and Tolkien’s works, consolation comes only when the object of obsession is abandoned (voluntarily or otherwise).’ (p. 125)
[2] Lynn Forest-Hill, ‘Boromir, Byrhtnoth, and Bayard: Finding a Language for Grief in J.R.R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings’, Tolkien Studies, 5 (2008) 73-97 (p. 86).
[3] Ibid., p. 87.
[4] Brent D. Johnson, ‘Éowyn's grief’, Mythlore, 27 (2009), 117-27 (p. 118).

Men and Angels: Christianity and The Depiction of Tolkien's Elves


This week in Thinklings we turned our attention to Elves and talked in particular about the influence of Christianity and the Genesis story on their depiction.

We began first by thinking about The Silmarillion and the Creation myth that Tolkien builds in this book. We compared the creation of Eä to the creation of Earth and Arda to Eden, finding many similarities. We thought about how Eru is and is not like the Christian God. We considered the fact that ‘Ilúvatar, who retains omnipotence and all the attributes normally associated with the Christian God, does not rule through domination but rather through a delegation of power’.[1] Rather than create the world himself, he sends the Valar to create it; the Ainulindalë (music of the Ainur) was only an idea, or vision, of what the world could be, not a creation process in itself. The Valar, we noted, had to enter Eä and realise their vision with their own hands.

From this contemplation of the world’s creation, we went on to think about where the Elves fit into Tolkien’s Creation myth. Are they angels, or more like men, or something in between? We considered their angelic and their human qualities and then considered the following notion, which situates the Elves within the narrative of the Fall:

[Tolkien’s] elves are essentially humans who did not suffer the fate that, in Tolkien’s Christian belief, human suffered when Adam sinned and was expelled from the Garden of Eden. One punishment for that sin was that humans became mortal. Because Tolkien’s Elves did not Fall, they were immortal. Tolkien also believed that humans’ creative and intellectual powers declined as a result of the Fall. Elves did not, so their poetry, music, and art must be indescribably beautiful.[2]

The group generally agreed that Elves are somewhere between angel and human; like humans they a capable of causing sorrow in the world, but they also have gifts of artistry and immortality that set them apart from humans. From this, we took a brief diversion to discuss how immortality might be seen as a ‘curse’ and mortality as a ‘gift’. It was noted how the Elves envy men their mortality and how, bound to the world by their immortality, they cannot move on to the Other world. We also had a think about the following notion:

Tolkien did regard death (as the end of  biological life, not as painful experience) not only as a part of human life but even as necessary for eschatological perfection of  Men. [...] The cases of Aragorn and Théoden thus represent the theological position that with death a man’s life achieves its perfection and definitiveness by and through death.[3]

We talked about how this idea of death giving definitiveness to a man’s life. Some members mentioned Anglo-Saxon ideas of a ‘good’ death and the importance of a good death. Death concludes a man’s life and thus the manner of it is very important. Elves, we discussed, lack this sense of conclusion or completion.

To round off our discussion, we talked about the depiction of the Elves in Jackson’s trilogy. A number of members were somewhat dissatisfied with how they were depicted and we lamented the fact that some of their humour and light-heartedness was lacking from the films, although others liked their depiction. We also thought it a shame that people unfamiliar with the novels would not come to know the Elves’ culture and sorrow through their songs – however, it was agreed that it was best to not have Orlando Bloom break into a rendition of ‘The Song of Nimrodel’ in the woods of Lothlorien.

Finally, the group was treated to a magnificent Elf joke, and it seems only fair to share it with everyone else:

Q: How many Elves does it take to change a light bulb?
A: They don't change it; they just sit around in the dark singing sad songs about the glory of the light that was.


- Corinne

 



[1] Benjamin Saxton, ‘J. R. R. Tolkien, Sub-creation, and Theories of Authorship’, Mythlore, 31 (2013), 47-59 (pp. 55-56).
[2] Edward Willett, J.R.R. Tolkien: Master of Imaginary Worlds (New Jersey, Enslow Publishers, 2004), p. 49.
[3] Thomas Fornet-Ponse, ‘Strange and free"—On Some Aspects of the Nature of Elves and Men’, Tolkien Studies, 7 (2010), 67-89 (p. 76).